[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADrjBPomC-QaL8aR4QsEPm+Uu5_QoWQZUomLMZt+09-ywH3wjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:13:55 +0000
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: fix
alphanumeric ordering
Hi André,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 at 14:26, André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2026-01-12 at 14:16 +0000, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > Fix the places that don't have correct alphanumeric ordering. This will
> > make reasoning about where to add future entries more straightforward.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/google,gs101-clock.yaml | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/google,gs101-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/google,gs101-
> > clock.yaml
> > index 09e679c1a9def03d53b8b493929911ea902a1763..a8176687bb773ae90800b9c256bcccebfdef2e49 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/google,gs101-clock.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/google,gs101-clock.yaml
> > @@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ description: |
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > enum:
> > - - google,gs101-cmu-top
> > - google,gs101-cmu-apm
> > - - google,gs101-cmu-misc
> > - google,gs101-cmu-hsi0
> > - google,gs101-cmu-hsi2
> > + - google,gs101-cmu-misc
> > - google,gs101-cmu-peric0
> > - google,gs101-cmu-peric1
> > + - google,gs101-cmu-top
>
> If we keep 'top' at the top as one outlier, it'd reflect that it is the
> top unit and all other CMUs are children of it.
Thanks for the review. I opted to just keep it alphanumeric so it's
(hopefully) obvious what all future ordering should be.
>
> >
> > clocks:
> > minItems: 1
> > @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ allOf:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > enum:
> > - - google,gs101-cmu-top
> > - google,gs101-cmu-apm
> > + - google,gs101-cmu-top
>
> And here.
>
> Either way, I don't mind:
> Reviewed-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
regards,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists