linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gqso3q8gUZ3wPq1iG7zOBUu2cWMDZiHqCBU5dgdu_KTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 16:56:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The ACPI and ACPI IORT specifications were updated to support bindings
> required to describe GICv5 based systems.
>
> The ACPI specification GICv5 bindings ECR [1] were approved and the
> required changes merged in the ACPICA upstream repository[5].
>
> The Arm IORT specification [2] has been updated to include GICv5 IWB
> specific bindings in revision E.g.
>
> Implement kernel code that - based on the aforementioned bindings - adds
> support for GICv5 ACPI probing.
>
> ACPICA changes supporting the bindings are posted with the series; they
> were cherry-picked from the upcoming ACPICA Linuxised release patches
> and they should _not_ be merged in any upstream branch because the
> full set of Linuxised ACPICA changes will be subsequently posted in
> order to be merged, I added the two ACPICA patches to make the series
> self-contained.

The patches in question have been included in this series:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/12822121.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki/

and are going to be applied shortly.

Thanks!