linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aWfMTjukKcIlQugi@lpieralisi>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 18:03:10 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip/gic-v5: Code first ACPI boot support

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 04:56:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lpieralisi@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The ACPI and ACPI IORT specifications were updated to support bindings
> > required to describe GICv5 based systems.
> >
> > The ACPI specification GICv5 bindings ECR [1] were approved and the
> > required changes merged in the ACPICA upstream repository[5].
> >
> > The Arm IORT specification [2] has been updated to include GICv5 IWB
> > specific bindings in revision E.g.
> >
> > Implement kernel code that - based on the aforementioned bindings - adds
> > support for GICv5 ACPI probing.
> >
> > ACPICA changes supporting the bindings are posted with the series; they
> > were cherry-picked from the upcoming ACPICA Linuxised release patches
> > and they should _not_ be merged in any upstream branch because the
> > full set of Linuxised ACPICA changes will be subsequently posted in
> > order to be merged, I added the two ACPICA patches to make the series
> > self-contained.
> 
> The patches in question have been included in this series:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/12822121.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki/
> 
> and are going to be applied shortly.

Thanks Rafael, I will rebase the series and mark the dependency then.

Lorenzo