[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260114-notorious-bison-of-wholeness-0da70f@quoll>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:39:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeyaprakash.soundrapandian@....qualcomm.com,
Vijay Kumar Tumati <vijay.tumati@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for SM8750
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 02:28:27AM -0800, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
> Add bindings for Camera Subsystem (CAMSS) on the Qualcomm SM8750 platform.
>
> The SM8750 platform provides:
>
> - 3 x VFE (Video Front End), 5 RDI per VFE
> - 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE Lite
> - 3 x CSID (CSI Decoder)
> - 2 x CSID Lite
> - 6 x CSIPHY (CSI Physical Layer)
> - 2 x ICP (Image Control Processor)
> - 1 x IPE (Image Processing Engine)
> - 2 x JPEG DMA & Downscaler
> - 2 x JPEG Encoder
> - 1 x OFE (Offline Front End)
> - 5 x RT CDM (Camera Data Mover)
> - 3 x TPG (Test Pattern Generator)
>
> Signed-off-by: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/media/qcom,sm8750-camss.yaml | 663 +++++++++++++++++++++
Why are you changing the change IDs?
b4 diff '20260113-sm8750-camss-v2-0-e5487b98eada@....qualcomm.com'
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20260113-sm8750-camss-v2-0-e5487b98eada@....qualcomm.com/t.mbox.gz
Checking for older revisions
Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
---
Analyzing 8 messages in the thread
Could not find lower series to compare against.
Look at your v1 b4 data. Now look at this one. This is completely messed
up process, not how you are suppose to use b4.
You make it difficult for us to handle your patch and I do not see
reason why this should be my cost.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists