[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c163d50f-d6ac-4a2b-beae-b33128d58912@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:10:53 +0800
From: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeyaprakash.soundrapandian@....qualcomm.com,
Vijay Kumar Tumati <vijay.tumati@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for SM8750
On 1/14/2026 4:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 02:28:27AM -0800, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
>> Add bindings for Camera Subsystem (CAMSS) on the Qualcomm SM8750 platform.
>>
>> The SM8750 platform provides:
>>
>> - 3 x VFE (Video Front End), 5 RDI per VFE
>> - 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE Lite
>> - 3 x CSID (CSI Decoder)
>> - 2 x CSID Lite
>> - 6 x CSIPHY (CSI Physical Layer)
>> - 2 x ICP (Image Control Processor)
>> - 1 x IPE (Image Processing Engine)
>> - 2 x JPEG DMA & Downscaler
>> - 2 x JPEG Encoder
>> - 1 x OFE (Offline Front End)
>> - 5 x RT CDM (Camera Data Mover)
>> - 3 x TPG (Test Pattern Generator)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/media/qcom,sm8750-camss.yaml | 663 +++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Why are you changing the change IDs?
>
> b4 diff '20260113-sm8750-camss-v2-0-e5487b98eada@....qualcomm.com'
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20260113-sm8750-camss-v2-0-e5487b98eada@....qualcomm.com/t.mbox.gz
> Checking for older revisions
> Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
> ---
> Analyzing 8 messages in the thread
> Could not find lower series to compare against.
>
> Look at your v1 b4 data. Now look at this one. This is completely messed
> up process, not how you are suppose to use b4.
>
> You make it difficult for us to handle your patch and I do not see
> reason why this should be my cost.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi Krzysztof, sorry for this oversight. I did a rebase work for this
series and found I couldn't fetch 'Reviewed-by' tags for the rebased
one. I think that issue has the same substance with what you point out.
Thank you for providing me the clues and apologize again.
Would it be acceptable for me to submit a v2 revision that only updates
the 'change-id' in the cover letter? This approach seems to resolve the
issue on my side and should help reduce your workload as well.
Best Regards,
Hangxiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists