[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWjw7_poJUIh9HgI@lore-desk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:51:43 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Add support for rotation
sensor
On Jan 15, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Some IMU chips in the LSM6DSX family have sensor fusion features that
> > > combine data from the accelerometer and gyroscope. One of these features
> > > generates rotation vector data and makes it available in the hardware
> > > FIFO as a quaternion (more specifically, the X, Y and Z components of the
> > > quaternion vector, expressed as 16-bit half-precision floating-point
> > > numbers).
> > >
> > > Add support for a new sensor instance that allows receiving sensor fusion
> > > data, by defining a new struct st_lsm6dsx_sf_settings (which contains
> > > chip-specific details for the sensor fusion functionality), and adding this
> > > struct as a new field in struct st_lsm6dsx_settings. In st_lsm6dsx_core.c,
> > > populate this new struct for the LSM6DSV and LSM6DSV16X chips, and add the
> > > logic to initialize an additional IIO device if this struct is populated
> > > for the hardware type being probed.
> > > Note: a new IIO device is being defined (as opposed to adding channels to
> > > an existing device) because the rate at which sensor fusion data is
> > > generated may not match the data rate from any of the existing devices.
> > >
> > > Tested on LSMDSV16X.
>
> ...
>
> > > + settings = &sensor->hw->settings->sf_settings;
> > > + switch (mask) {
> > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: {
> > > + u32 odr_mHz;
> > > + u8 odr_val;
> > > +
> > > + odr_mHz = val * MILLI + val2 * MILLI / MICRO;
> > > + err = st_lsm6dsx_sf_get_odr_val(settings, odr_mHz, &odr_val);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > +
> > > + sensor->hwfifo_odr_mHz = odr_mHz;
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > break;
> >
> > > + }
> > > + default:
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > break;
> >
> > > + }
> >
> > return err;
>
> Why?
I guess it is more clear, but just a Nit, I can live with the current implementation.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists