[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aWjyjLnNE-K0AyUi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:58:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Add support for rotation
sensor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:51:43PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> On Jan 15, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
...
> > > > + settings = &sensor->hw->settings->sf_settings;
> > > > + switch (mask) {
> > > > + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: {
> > > > + u32 odr_mHz;
> > > > + u8 odr_val;
> > > > +
> > > > + odr_mHz = val * MILLI + val2 * MILLI / MICRO;
> > > > + err = st_lsm6dsx_sf_get_odr_val(settings, odr_mHz, &odr_val);
> > > > + if (err)
> > > > + return err;
> > > > +
> > > > + sensor->hwfifo_odr_mHz = odr_mHz;
> > > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > > + }
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > return err;
> >
> > Why?
>
> I guess it is more clear, but just a Nit, I can live with the current implementation.
At least what you proposed is the opposite to the style that is accepted
in IIO.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists