[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ee84cb9-ef6d-43ac-b9d0-9c22e7d1ecd8@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:22:30 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, x86@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/fpu: Clear XSTATE_BV[i] in save state whenever
XFD[i]=1
On 1/15/26 16:54, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/1/26 01:05, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> When loading guest XSAVE state via KVM_SET_XSAVE, and when updating XFD in
>> response to a guest WRMSR, clear XFD-disabled features in the saved (or to
>> be restored) XSTATE_BV to ensure KVM doesn't attempt to load state for
>> features that are disabled via the guest's XFD. Because the kernel
>> executes XRSTOR with the guest's XFD, saving XSTATE_BV[i]=1 with XFD[i]=1
>> will cause XRSTOR to #NM and panic the kernel.
>
> It would be really nice to see the actual ordering of events here. What
> order do the KVM_SET_XSAVE, XFD[$FOO]=1 and kernel_fpu_begin() have to
> happen in to trigger this?
The problematic case is described a couple paragraphs below: "This can
happen if the guest executes WRMSR(MSR_IA32_XFD) to set XFD[18] = 1, and
a host IRQ triggers kernel_fpu_begin() prior to the vmexit handler's
call to fpu_update_guest_xfd()."
Or more in detail:
Guest running with MSR_IA32_XFD = 0
WRMSR(MSR_IA32_XFD)
vmexit
Host:
enable IRQ
interrupt handler
kernel_fpu_begin() -> sets TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD
XSAVE -> stores XINUSE[18] = 1
...
kernel_fpu_end()
handle vmexit
fpu_update_guest_xfd() -> XFD[18] = 1
reenter guest
fpu_swap_kvm_fpstate()
XRSTOR -> XINUSE[18] = 1 && XFD[18] = 1 -> #NM and boom
With the patch, fpu_update_guest_xfd() sees TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD set and
clears the bit from xinuse.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists