[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc4DSk=-tf2oFJyd16GSSdWO1NELsCPe26BKVKUuq_Byw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:40:36 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Hamdan Khan <hamdankhan212@...il.com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, andy@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hansg@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
mchehab@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: media: atomisp: Fix typos and formatting in headers
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:32 PM Hamdan Khan <hamdankhan212@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried to run kernel-doc script against this file? I believe
> > it will be a difference between before and after.
>
> I just ran the kernel-doc script for both the previous and updated
> comments. The script doesn't detect kernel-doc for either of them,
> comments even with /** because they're missing the struct
> definition in the comment like:
>
> /**
> * struct atomisp_dvs2_coef_types - Brief description
> * @odd_real: Real part of the odd coefficients
> * @odd_imag: Imaginary part of the odd coefficients
> * ... so on
> */
>
> Though, these can be converted to be kernel-doc compliant if you
> prefer it.
In this case it's not needed. Please, clarify in the commit message
that even if some comments look like kernel-doc, they are not.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists