linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] alloc_tag: fix rw permission issue when handling boot parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20260115141222.2fd0f636c1f480a664d583a4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:12:22 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: ranxiaokai627@....com, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ran.xiaokai@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] alloc_tag: fix rw permission issue when handling
 boot parameter

On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 20:58:52 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:

> > > Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > > Acked-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>
> >
> > Should we backport it?
> 
> I'm not sure a single boot time warning produced only in debug mode
> warrants backporting. Do you think we should do it anyway?

Not if you don't ;)  Just checking...