[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MA5PR01MB1250082D757C8DEFE005EE71AFE8CA@MA5PR01MB12500.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:49:54 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>,
Nutty Liu <liujingqi@...xincomputing.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Zixian Zeng <sycamoremoon376@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: dts: sophgo: Move PLIC and CLINT node into CPU
dtsi
On 1/13/2026 10:38 AM, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> As we have a separate CPU dtsi file, move the PLIC and CLINT
> node to the CPU dtsi file. This will make the sg2042.dtsi force
> peripheral devices, and make the CPU dtsi force CPU related
> devices.
LGTM, except for the word "force" in the commit message; it seems a bit
odd. Perhaps it would be better to write: "This will make all peripheral
devices are defined in the sg2042.dtsi
and all CPU-related are defined in the CPU dtsi."
Reviewed-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-cpus.dtsi | 305 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi | 303 -------------------
> 2 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 303 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-cpus.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-cpus.dtsi
> index 94a4b71acad3..509488eee432 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-cpus.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-cpus.dtsi
[......]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists