[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pgz2mhy4si2tu4iwusabjxxi4nctz3lamnpbg7773a2mp7srph@bz3ovwxuyakq>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:07:08 +1100
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
adhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm/zone_device: Reinitialize large zone device
private folios
On 2026-01-15 at 17:18 +1100, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com> wrote...
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 09:57:31PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 04:27:26PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > > On 2026-01-15 at 06:19 +1100, Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com> wrote...
> > > > From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Reinitialize metadata for large zone device private folios in
> > > > zone_device_page_init prior to creating a higher-order zone device
> > > > private folio. This step is necessary when the folio’s order changes
> > > > dynamically between zone_device_page_init calls to avoid building a
> > > > corrupt folio. As part of the metadata reinitialization, the dev_pagemap
> > > > must be passed in from the caller because the pgmap stored in the folio
> > > > page may have been overwritten with a compound head.
> > >
> > > Thanks for fixing, a couple of minor comments below.
> > >
> > > > Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> > > > Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
> > > > Cc: adhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > > > Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
> > > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> > > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@....com>
> > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
> > > > Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
> > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> > > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > > > Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> > > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> > > > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> > > > Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > > > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > > > Cc: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
> > > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> > > > Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> > > > Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Fixes: d245f9b4ab80 ("mm/zone_device: support large zone device private folios")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +-
> > > > include/linux/memremap.h | 9 ++++++---
> > > > lib/test_hmm.c | 4 +++-
> > > > mm/memremap.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > 7 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> > > > index e5000bef90f2..7cf9310de0ec 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> > > > @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static struct page *kvmppc_uvmem_get_page(unsigned long gpa, struct kvm *kvm)
> > > >
> > > > dpage = pfn_to_page(uvmem_pfn);
> > > > dpage->zone_device_data = pvt;
> > > > - zone_device_page_init(dpage, 0);
> > > > + zone_device_page_init(dpage, &kvmppc_uvmem_pgmap, 0);
> > > > return dpage;
> > > > out_clear:
> > > > spin_lock(&kvmppc_uvmem_bitmap_lock);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> > > > index af53e796ea1b..6ada7b4af7c6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> > > > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ svm_migrate_get_vram_page(struct svm_range *prange, unsigned long pfn)
> > > > page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > > > svm_range_bo_ref(prange->svm_bo);
> > > > page->zone_device_data = prange->svm_bo;
> > > > - zone_device_page_init(page, 0);
> > > > + zone_device_page_init(page, page_pgmap(page), 0);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c
> > > > index 03ee39a761a4..c497726b0147 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_pagemap.c
> > > > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static void drm_pagemap_get_devmem_page(struct page *page,
> > > > struct drm_pagemap_zdd *zdd)
> > > > {
> > > > page->zone_device_data = drm_pagemap_zdd_get(zdd);
> > > > - zone_device_page_init(page, 0);
> > > > + zone_device_page_init(page, zdd->dpagemap->pagemap, 0);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> > > > index 58071652679d..3d8031296eed 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> > > > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ nouveau_dmem_page_alloc_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, bool is_large)
> > > > order = ilog2(DMEM_CHUNK_NPAGES);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - zone_device_folio_init(folio, order);
> > > > + zone_device_folio_init(folio, page_pgmap(folio_page(folio, 0)), order);
> > > > return page;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > > > index 713ec0435b48..e3c2ccf872a8 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> > > > @@ -224,7 +224,8 @@ static inline bool is_fsdax_page(const struct page *page)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE
> > > > -void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
> > > > +void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> > > > + unsigned int order);
> > > > void *memremap_pages(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, int nid);
> > > > void memunmap_pages(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> > > > void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap);
> > > > @@ -234,9 +235,11 @@ bool pgmap_pfn_valid(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap, unsigned long pfn);
> > > >
> > > > unsigned long memremap_compat_align(void);
> > > >
> > > > -static inline void zone_device_folio_init(struct folio *folio, unsigned int order)
> > > > +static inline void zone_device_folio_init(struct folio *folio,
> > > > + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> > > > + unsigned int order)
> > > > {
> > > > - zone_device_page_init(&folio->page, order);
> > > > + zone_device_page_init(&folio->page, pgmap, order);
> > > > if (order)
> > > > folio_set_large_rmappable(folio);
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
> > > > index 8af169d3873a..455a6862ae50 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
> > > > @@ -662,7 +662,9 @@ static struct page *dmirror_devmem_alloc_page(struct dmirror *dmirror,
> > > > goto error;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - zone_device_folio_init(page_folio(dpage), order);
> > > > + zone_device_folio_init(page_folio(dpage),
> > > > + page_pgmap(folio_page(page_folio(dpage), 0)),
> > > > + order);
> > > > dpage->zone_device_data = rpage;
> > > > return dpage;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
> > > > index 63c6ab4fdf08..6f46ab14662b 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/memremap.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/memremap.c
> > > > @@ -477,10 +477,28 @@ void free_zone_device_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> > > > +void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> > > > + unsigned int order)
> > > > {
> > > > + struct page *new_page = page;
> > > > + unsigned int i;
> > > > +
> > > > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
> > > >
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); ++i, ++new_page) {
> > > > + struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_page;
> > > > +
> > > > + new_page->flags.f &= ~0xffUL; /* Clear possible order, page head */
> > >
> > > This seems odd to me, mainly due to the "magic" number. Why not just clear
> > > the flags entirely? Or at least explicitly just clear the flags you care about
> > > which would remove the need for the comment and should let you use the proper
> > > PageFlag functions.
> > >
> >
> > I'm copying this from folio_reset_order [1]. My paranoia about touching
> > anything related to struct page is high, so I did the same thing
> > folio_reset_order does here.
So why not just use folio_reset_order() below?
> >
> > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.5/source/include/linux/mm.h#L1075
> >
>
> This immediately hangs my first SVM test...
>
> diff --git a/mm/memremap.c b/mm/memremap.c
> index 6f46ab14662b..ef8c56876cf5 100644
> --- a/mm/memremap.c
> +++ b/mm/memremap.c
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ void zone_device_page_init(struct page *page, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap,
> for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); ++i, ++new_page) {
> struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_page;
>
> - new_page->flags.f &= ~0xffUL; /* Clear possible order, page head */
> + new_page->flags.f = 0;
> #ifdef NR_PAGES_IN_LARGE_FOLIO
> ((struct folio *)(new_page - 1))->_nr_pages = 0;
This seems wrong to me - I saw your reply to Balbir but for an order-0 page
isn't this going to access a completely different, possibly already allocated,
page?
> #endif
>
> I can walk through exactly which flags need to be cleared, but my
> feeling is that likely any flag that the order field overloads and can
> possibly encode should be cleared—so bits 0–7 based on the existing
> code.
>
> How about in a follow-up we normalize setting / clearing the order flag
> field with a #define and an inline helper?
Ie: Would something like the following work:
ClearPageHead(new_page);
clear_compound_head(new_page);
folio_reset_order(new_folio);
Which would also deal with setting _nr_pages.
> Matt
>
> > > > +#ifdef NR_PAGES_IN_LARGE_FOLIO
> > > > + ((struct folio *)(new_page - 1))->_nr_pages = 0;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > + new_folio->mapping = NULL;
> > > > + new_folio->pgmap = pgmap; /* Also clear compound head */
> > > > + new_folio->share = 0; /* fsdax only, unused for device private */
> > >
> > > It would be nice if the FS DAX code actually used this as well. Is there a
> > > reason that change was dropped from the series?
> > >
> >
> > I don't have a test platform for FS DAX. In prior revisions, I was just
> > moving existing FS DAX code to a helper, which I felt confident about.
> >
> > This revision is slightly different, and I don't feel comfortable
> > modifying FS DAX code without a test platform. I agree we should update
> > FS DAX, but that should be done in a follow-up with coordinated testing.
Fair enough, I figured something like this might be your answer :-) You
could update it and ask people with access to such a system to test it though
(unfortunately my setup has bit-rotted beyond repair).
But I'm ok leaving to for a future change.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > > > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_ref_count(new_folio), new_folio);
> > > > + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_is_zone_device(new_folio), new_folio);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Drivers shouldn't be allocating pages after calling
> > > > * memunmap_pages().
> > > > --
> > > > 2.43.0
> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists