linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] usb: typec: ucsi: ucsi_glink: Add support for X1E80100 compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260115-annoying-ludicrous-hummingbird-c7cefe@quoll>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 10:14:55 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Anjelique Melendez <anjelique.melendez@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, 
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, abel.vesa@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] usb: typec: ucsi: ucsi_glink: Add support for
 X1E80100 compatible string

On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 01:17:58PM -0800, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
> Add support for the X1E80100 compatible string which needs UCSI_DELAY_DEVICE_PDOS quirk.

Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597


> 
> Signed-off-by: Anjelique Melendez <anjelique.melendez@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> index 11b3e24e34e2..e700c6a58a46 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_glink.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pmic_glink_ucsi_of_quirks[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sc8180x, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = &quirk_sm8450, },

So is it compatible with sm8550 or not? Based on this commit it would
be, so you need to clarify here why you decided not to make them
compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof