[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad688ba9-7771-4b64-a9d7-ec5100345460@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:35:13 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] spi: Documentation: add page on multi-lane support
On 1/14/26 3:10 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:45:23 -0600
> David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>
>> Add a new page to Documentation/spi/ describing how multi-lane SPI
>> support works. This is uncommon functionality so it deserves its own
>> documentation page.
>>
...
>> +
>> +For example, a dual-simultaneous-sampling ADC with two 4-bit lanes might be
>> +wired up like this::
>> +
>> + +--------------+ +----------+
>> + | SPI | | AD4630 |
>> + | Controller | | ADC |
>> + | | | |
>> + | CS0 |--->| CS |
>> + | SCK |--->| SCK |
>> + | SDO |--->| SDI |
>> + | | | |
>> + | SDIA0 |<---| SDOA0 |
>> + | SDIA1 |<---| SDOA1 |
>> + | SDIA2 |<---| SDOA2 |
>> + | SDIA3 |<---| SDOA3 |
>> + | | | |
>> + | SDIB0 |<---| SDOB0 |
>> + | SDIB1 |<---| SDOB1 |
>> + | SDIB2 |<---| SDOB2 |
>> + | SDIB3 |<---| SDOB3 |
>> + | | | |
>> + +--------------+ +----------+
>> +
>> +It is described in a devicetree like this::
>> +
>> + spi {
>> + compatible = "my,spi-controller";
>> +
>> + ...
>> +
>> + adc@0 {
>> + compatible = "adi,ad4630";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + ...
>> + spi-rx-bus-width = <4>, <4>; /* 2 lanes of 4 bits each */
>> + ...
>> + };
>> + };
...
>> +properties are needed to provide a mapping between controller lanes and the
>> +physical lane wires.
>> +
>> +Here is an example where a multi-lane SPI controller has each lane wired to
>> +separate single-lane peripherals::
>> +
>> + +--------------+ +----------+
>> + | SPI | | Thing 1 |
>> + | Controller | | |
>> + | | | |
>> + | CS0 |--->| CS |
>> + | SDO0 |--->| SDI |
>> + | SDI0 |<---| SDO |
>> + | SCLK0 |--->| SCLK |
>> + | | | |
>> + | | +----------+
>> + | |
>> + | | +----------+
>> + | | | Thing 2 |
>> + | | | |
>> + | CS1 |--->| CS |
>> + | SDO1 |--->| SDI |
>> + | SDI1 |<---| SDO |
>> + | SCLK1 |--->| SCLK |
>> + | | | |
>> + +--------------+ +----------+
>> +
>> +This is described in a devicetree like this::
>> +
>> + spi {
>> + compatible = "my,spi-controller";
>> +
>> + ...
>> +
>> + thing1@0 {
>> + compatible = "my,thing1";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + ...
>> + };
>> +
>> + thing2@1 {
>> + compatible = "my,thing2";
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + ...
>> + spi-tx-lane-map = <1>; /* lane 0 is not used, lane 1 is used for tx wire */
>> + spi-rx-lane-map = <1>; /* lane 0 is not used, lane 1 is used for rx wire */
>
> Whilst simple I'd kind of expect a multi lane case as the example, or this and
> the multilane one? For me the comment that follows is sufficient for the 1 lane
> offset case you have here.
I thought that is what I did. I have one example that shows multiple lanes (ADC)
and one example that shows the map (Thing 1/2).
But I guess you mean that you want a 3rd example that show both the map and
multiple lanes at the same time?
I chose these two examples because they came from real-world use cases that
drove adding this feature. We didn't have a real-world case yet that used
both the map and multiple lanes at the same time so I didn't include that.
>
>> + ...
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> +
>> +The default values of ``spi-rx-bus-width`` and ``spi-tx-bus-width`` are ``<1>``,
>> +so these properties can still be omitted even when ``spi-rx-lane-map`` and
>> +``spi-tx-lane-map`` are used.
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists