lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87qzrpucae.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 10:39:21 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,  Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
  Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,  Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
  Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,  Vaishnav Achath
 <vaishnav.a@...com>,  Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
  Hervé Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,  Wolfram Sang
 <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,  Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>,  Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,  Pratyush Yadav
 <pratyush@...nel.org>,  Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>,
  linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,  devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: Add Renesas
 RZ/N1D400 to the list

Hello Geert,

>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/cdns,qspi-nor.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/cdns,qspi-nor.yaml
>> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ properties:
>>            # controllers are meant to be used with flashes of all kinds,
>>            # ie. also NAND flashes, not only NOR flashes.
>>            - const: cdns,qspi-nor
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: renesas,r9a06g032-qspi
>> +          - const: renesas,rzn1-qspi
>> +          - const: cdns,qspi-nor
>
> Doesn't the need for (at least) the CQSPI_NO_INDIRECT_MODE flag mean
> that this device is not compatible with cdns,qspi-nor, and thus the
> cdns,qspi-nor fallback must not be used?

I understand the question. It is true that I use driver data to limit
the number of features the IP can use and this data is associated to the
Renesas compatible, but I believe all other flavours of this IP would
also not work without driver data attached to their front
compatible. None of the SoCs with the Cadence QSPI IP actually would run
without their own driver data. For me the fallback compatible is
relevant because it describes the hardware as "this is a derivative of
the Cadence controller" (and it is clearly the case, and this is also
mentioned in the reference manual), even though I agree using
cdns,qspi-nor would definitely not work alone. But again, none of the
other flavours would anyway.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ