linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Correct wrong kfree() usage for `kobj->name`

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aWoGw8PEKj_5mncV@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:37:07 +0000
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Correct wrong kfree() usage for `kobj->name`

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > `kobj->name` should be freed by kfree_const()[1][2].  Correct it.
> > 
> > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/lib/kasprintf.c#L41
> > [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/lib/kobject.c#L695
> > 
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Fixes: b49493f99690 ("Fix a memory leak in scsi_host_dev_release()")
> > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > index e047747d4ecf..50ec782cf9f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void scsi_host_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> >  		 * name as well as the proc dir structure are leaked.
> >  		 */
> >  		scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(shost->hostt);
> > -		kfree(dev_name(&shost->shost_dev));
> > +		kfree_const(dev_name(&shost->shost_dev));
> 
> Shouldn't the struct device name be freed by the driver core for this
> device when it goes out of scope?  Why is it being manually freed here
> at all?

Ah, correct.  I think the following patch is what it really needs:

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 1b3fbd328277..e3362f445f93 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -373,7 +373,6 @@ static void scsi_host_dev_release(struct device *dev)
 		 * name as well as the proc dir structure are leaked.
 		 */
 		scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(shost->hostt);
-		kfree(dev_name(&shost->shost_dev));
 	}

 	kfree(shost->shost_data);
@@ -548,11 +547,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(const struct scsi_host_template *sht, int priv
 		goto fail;
 	return shost;
  fail:
-	/*
-	 * Host state is still SHOST_CREATED and that is enough to release
-	 * ->shost_gendev. scsi_host_dev_release() will free
-	 * dev_name(&shost->shost_dev).
-	 */
+	put_device(&shost->shost_dev);
 	put_device(&shost->shost_gendev);

 	return NULL;