[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cc5e036-12b6-4b0d-9393-21bbb0dd3f48@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:39:51 +0530
From: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <jyri.sarha@....fi>,
<tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>, <airlied@...il.com>, <simona@...ll.ch>,
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>, <mwalle@...nel.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devarsht@...com>, <praneeth@...com>,
<u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add am62p dss
compatible
Hi Krzysztof,
On 1/16/26 15:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2026 10:54, Swamil Jain wrote:
>> TI's AM62P SoC contains two instances of the TI Keystone Display
>> SubSystem (DSS), each with two video ports and two video planes. These
>> instances support up to three independent video streams through OLDI,
>> DPI, and DSI interfaces. The OLDI interfaces utilizes two OLDI
>> transmitters OLDI0 and OLDI1.
>>
>> DSS0 (first instance) supports:
>> - With respect to OLDI Tx interfaces, DSS0 instance can either drive
>> both OLDI0 Tx and OLDI1 Tx together (e.g. dual link mode or clone
>> mode) or can only drive OLDI0 Tx in single link mode with OLDI1 being
>> utilized by DSS1 or left unused.
>> - DPI output from video port 2.
>>
>> DSS1 (second instance) supports:
>> - With respect to OLDI Tx interfaces, DSS1 instance can only drive
>> OLDI1 Tx given DSS0 is not utilizing that as described above.
>> - DSI controller output from video port 2.
>>
>> The two OLDI transmitters can be configured in clone mode to drive a
>> pair of identical OLDI single-link displays. DPI outputs from
>> DSS0 VP2, DSS1 VP1, and DSS1 VP2 are multiplexed, allowing only one
>> DPI output at a time.
>>
>> Add the compatible string "ti,am62p-dss" and update related
>> description accordingly.
>>
>> AM62P has different power domains for DSS and OLDI compared to other
>> Keystone SoCs. DSS0 can have up to 3 power-domains for DSS0, OLDI0 and
>> OLDI1, and DSS1 can have up to 2 power-domains for DSS1 and OLDI1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@...com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> index 38fcee91211e..b1cec5383160 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
>> @@ -24,6 +24,19 @@ description: |
>> DPI signals are also routed internally to DSI Tx controller present within the
>> SoC. Due to clocking limitations only one of the interface i.e. either DSI or
>> DPI can be used at once.
>> + The AM62P has two instances of TI Keystone Display SubSystem, each with two
>> + video ports and two video planes. These instances can support up to 3
>> + independent video streams through OLDI, DPI, and DSI interfaces.
>> + DSS0 (first instance) supports:
>> + - Two OLDI TXes on video port 1, configurable in dual-link or
>> + single link clone mode
>> + - DPI output on video port 2
>> + DSS1 (second instance) supports:
>> + - One OLDI TX on video port 1 (single-link mode only)
>> + - DSI controller output on video port 2
>> + The two OLDI TXes can be configured in clone mode to drive a pair of
>> + identical OLDI single-link displays. DPI outputs from DSS0 VP2, DSS1 VP1,
>> + and DSS1 VP2 are muxed, allowing only one DPI output at a time.
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> @@ -31,6 +44,7 @@ properties:
>> - ti,am625-dss
>> - ti,am62a7-dss
>> - ti,am62l-dss
>> + - ti,am62p-dss
>> - ti,am65x-dss
>>
>> reg:
>> @@ -81,8 +95,13 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> power-domains:
>> - maxItems: 1
>> - description: phandle to the associated power domain
>> + minItems: 1
>> + description:
>> + phandle to the associated power domain(s).
>> + items:
>> + - description: DSS controller power domain
>> + - description: OLDI0 power domain
>> + - description: OLDI1 power domain
>
> No, I already rejected this.
Isn't it better to add items to the top level and have a min/max
constraint for different compatibles? For newer compatibles we will
have to again add items description if we go with your approach?
>
>
> This is not how review works. Look:
>
> 1. You wrote patch on 7th Jan.
> 2. I replied ONE DAY LATER.
> 3. You waited one week to give reply.
> 4. Then two days later you send new version not waiting for my reply.
>
> If you have one week to reply, then so do I.
>
> NAK, go to v3 and implement comments.
Sorry, we weren't aligned then.
Regards,
Swamil.
>
>>
>> dma-coherent: true
>>
>> @@ -196,6 +215,20 @@ allOf:
>> properties:
>> endpoint@1: false
>>
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: ti,am62p-dss
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + power-domains:
>> + maxItems: 3
>
> That's pointless. It's already 3.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists