lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c8203d0-499f-42be-9cc7-c205b03e76b3@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:24:14 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@...com>, jyri.sarha@....fi,
 tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev, mwalle@...nel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devarsht@...com, praneeth@...com,
 u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add am62p dss
 compatible

On 16/01/2026 12:09, Swamil Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is not how review works. Look:
>>
>> 1. You wrote patch on 7th Jan.
>> 2. I replied ONE DAY LATER.
>> 3. You waited one week to give reply.
>> 4. Then two days later you send new version not waiting for my reply.
>>
>> If you have one week to reply, then so do I.
>>
>> NAK, go to v3 and implement comments.
> 
> Sorry, we weren't aligned then.

Aligned on what? Did I respond? No. How much time you gave me to respond?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ