[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdf976a3-d386-40ac-99f9-5d6d1a175677@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 10:27:05 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>, Petr Hodina <phodina@...tonmail.com>,
Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>, "Dr. Git" <drgitx@...il.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Joel Selvaraj <foss@...lselvaraj.com>, Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] media: qcom: camss: csiphy-3ph: Add Gen2 v1.1 MIPI
CSI-2 CPHY init
On 18/01/2026 09:51, David Heidelberg wrote:
>>
>> If checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it, I think it probably should.
>>
>> Please standardise the location of the comment and have one for the
>> CPHY and one for the DPHY configs.
>
> Then I can rather replace the else with elseif (== DPHY) and make the
> comment irrelevant. What is your recommendation?
>
> David>
I think the code is pretty self-documenting without a comment.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists