lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1eff30f0-f619-419b-ab26-b8c68cad87df@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:58:21 +0500
From: Alexey Zagorodnikov <xglooom@...il.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Introduce option to disable
 Smart PC function in PMF

Sorry for the inconvenience, it is my first time :)

Originally bugreport here 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4868

But it turned out to be not a real bug, but rather a feature of the 
firmware, which in my case is not desirable. Would nice to have a toggle 
to disable, instead of completely blacklist module.

Should I send v2 patch with a new message?

On 1/18/26 20:20, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>
> On 1/18/2026 01:38, Alexey Zagorodnikov wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Zagorodnikov <xglooom@...il.com>
> Please include the context in the commit message instead of the cover
> letter. Additionally, if there are any bug reports or issue tracker
> entries (e.g., Bugzilla) documenting the problem this addresses,
> please reference them to provide justification for the change.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> index 8fc293c9c5380..00a4fc899c727 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ static bool force_load;
>>   module_param(force_load, bool, 0444);
>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_load, "Force load this driver on supported older platforms (experimental)");
>>   
>> +/* Force to disable Smart PC Solution */
>> +static bool disable_smart_pc;
>> +module_param(disable_smart_pc, bool, 0444);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_smart_pc, "Disable Smart PC Solution");
>> +
>>   static int amd_pmf_pwr_src_notify_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *data)
>>   {
>>   	struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf = container_of(nb, struct amd_pmf_dev, pwr_src_notifier);
>> @@ -362,11 +367,15 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>   		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev);
>> -	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> -		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
>> -		/* If Smart PC is enabled, no need to check for other features */
>> -		return;
>> +	if (disable_smart_pc) {
>> +		dev->smart_pc_enabled = false;
>> +	} else {
>> +		amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev);
>> +		if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> +			dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
>> +			/* If Smart PC is enabled, no need to check for other features */
>> +			return;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ