[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260119165244.4dc11e18@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:52:44 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
devicetree-compiler@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org, Hui Pu
<hui.pu@...ealthcare.com>, Ian Ray <ian.ray@...ealthcare.com>, Luca
Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 40/77] dtc: Introduce dti_get_node_by_path()
Hi David,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:47:29 +1100
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 03:19:30PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > The future introduction of orphan nodes for addons device-tree will lead
> > to more than one tree in the addons data. Those trees will be:
> > - the classical root tree starting at the root node
> > - trees related to orphan nodes
>
> This doesn't make sense to me. The new function still just takes a
> single path, nothing to specify which tree that path is looked up in.
>
> You can probably guarantee that labels and phandles are unique across
> all the trees. Not paths, though.
>
Paths can be unique across all trees. The tree needs to be indicated in the
path. Starting by '/' is the root tree.
For orphans, I proposed "$<orphan_name>/<path>" in patch 64 introducing
references by path for orphan nodes and so, for orphan trees.
Best regards,
Hervé
Powered by blists - more mailing lists