[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tswhswsp.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:48:22 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, William Zhang
<william.zhang@...adcom.com>, Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, David
Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Rafał Miłecki
<rafal@...ecki.pl>, Simon Glass
<sjg@...omium.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mtd: Partition binding fixes and
restructuring
Hello Rob,
On 08/01/2026 at 11:53:09 -06, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> The partition bindings fail to restrict undefined properties. This is
> primarily on fixed-partitions which can be nested and partition nodes
> without a compatible string. This series fixes those issues and then
> several problems exposed by restricting undefined properties. As part of
> this, the schema structure is reworked to follow more conventional
> structure of applying schemas by compatible and a schema only checks 1
> level of nodes (unless possible child nodes are fixed).
The series does not apply cleanly, I tried mtd/next and then
v6.19-rc1. Can you please rebase it and fix the conflicts (at least 2
patches fail, and then I stopped)?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists