linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mtd: Partition binding fixes and restructuring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ7_yKRTCOrxcq0QDy_MRMCRMQqhH=TKiBs=nubqNN9HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:54:24 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>, Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, 
	William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>, Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, 
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>, 
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>, 
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, 
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mtd: Partition binding fixes and restructuring

On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 4:48 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Rob,
>
> On 08/01/2026 at 11:53:09 -06, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > The partition bindings fail to restrict undefined properties. This is
> > primarily on fixed-partitions which can be nested and partition nodes
> > without a compatible string. This series fixes those issues and then
> > several problems exposed by restricting undefined properties. As part of
> > this, the schema structure is reworked to follow more conventional
> > structure of applying schemas by compatible and a schema only checks 1
> > level of nodes (unless possible child nodes are fixed).
>
> The series does not apply cleanly, I tried mtd/next and then
> v6.19-rc1. Can you please rebase it and fix the conflicts (at least 2
> patches fail, and then I stopped)?

I rebased on mtd/next and sent v2. I only saw one conflict though, and
that was with seama.yaml. That's going to conflict with Linus' tree,
but the resolution is take the deleted file.

Rob