[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026012020-cut-versus-a50b@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:34:26 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: 2023060904@....edu.cn
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
guagua210311@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rtl8723bs: Refactor continual_io_error check
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 10:11:25PM +0800, 2023060904@....edu.cn wrote:
> From: Changjun Zheng <guagua210311@...com>
>
> Refactor the error count check logic to follow kernel 'single responsibility' principle:
> 1. Move the increment logic (atomic_inc) from rtw_inc_and_chk_continual_io_error() to its callers in sdio_ops_linux.c (line 226/302)
> 2. Keep only the check logic in rtw_inc_and_chk_continual_io_error() (use atomic_read to get current count)
>
> This change addresses Greg KH's feedback to move increment to callers, while keeping atomic operations to ensure no compilation/run-time errors.
Please wait, relax, and take a few days to think about this code and the
patch series that I hope you read.
Then start over and create a brand new patch series based on what you
think should be done, NOT what AI is telling you should be done (hint,
it is wrong...)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists