[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56bbd1d8-4ea7-41b9-beac-2e496bf81206@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:54:21 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>,
Phani Burra <phani.r.burra@...el.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Joshua Hay <joshua.a.hay@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] idpf: Fix data race in idpf_net_dim
[Cc: Remove bouncing alan.brady@...el.com and pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com]
Am 20.01.26 um 17:50 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear David,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 19.01.26 um 17:27 schrieb David Yang:
>> In idpf_net_dim(), some statistics protected by u64_stats_sync, are read
>> and accumulated in ignorance of possible u64_stats_fetch_retry() events.
>> The correct way to copy statistics is already illustrated by
>> idpf_add_queue_stats(). Fix this by reading them into temporary variables
>> first.
>
> It’d be great if you also documented a test case.
>
>> Fixes: c2d548cad150 ("idpf: add TX splitq napi poll support")
>> Fixes: 3a8845af66ed ("idpf: add RX splitq napi poll support")
>> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>> index 97a5fe766b6b..66ba645e8b90 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>> @@ -3956,7 +3956,7 @@ static void idpf_update_dim_sample(struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector,
>> static void idpf_net_dim(struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector)
>> {
>> struct dim_sample dim_sample = { };
>> - u64 packets, bytes;
>> + u64 packets, bytes, pkts, bts;
>
> The new variable names are ambiguous. Would _tmp or so be better?
>
>> u32 i;
>> if (!IDPF_ITR_IS_DYNAMIC(q_vector->tx_intr_mode))
>> @@ -3968,9 +3968,12 @@ static void idpf_net_dim(struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector)
>> do {
>> start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&txq->stats_sync);
>> - packets += u64_stats_read(&txq->q_stats.packets);
>> - bytes += u64_stats_read(&txq->q_stats.bytes);
>> + pkts = u64_stats_read(&txq->q_stats.packets);
>> + bts = u64_stats_read(&txq->q_stats.bytes);
>> } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&txq->stats_sync, start));
>> +
>> + packets += pkts;
>> + bytes += bts;
>> }
>> idpf_update_dim_sample(q_vector, &dim_sample, &q_vector->tx_dim,
>> @@ -3987,9 +3990,12 @@ static void idpf_net_dim(struct idpf_q_vector *q_vector)
>> do {
>> start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&rxq->stats_sync);
>> - packets += u64_stats_read(&rxq->q_stats.packets);
>> - bytes += u64_stats_read(&rxq->q_stats.bytes);
>> + pkts = u64_stats_read(&rxq->q_stats.packets);
>> + bts = u64_stats_read(&rxq->q_stats.bytes);
>> } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&rxq->stats_sync, start));
>> +
>> + packets += pkts;
>> + bytes += bts;
>> }
>> idpf_update_dim_sample(q_vector, &dim_sample, &q_vector->rx_dim,
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists