lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260120233617.GA10653@quark>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:36:17 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/12] crypto: Add RSASSA-PSS support

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:15:57PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > As I mentioned in another reply, error-prone string parsing isn't a
> > great choice.  C has native support for function parameters.
> 
> But is constrained that it has to work with KEYCTL_PKEY_VERIFY's info
> parameter.

The cover letter of this patchset summarizes it as "These patches add
ML-DSA module signing and RSASSA-PSS module signing."  Adding
KEYCTL_PKEY_VERIFY support for these algorithms would be a significant
new UAPI feature that would need its own justification and its own
documentation and test updates.

However, it was established pretty clearly in past discussions that
KEYCTL_PKEY_* are a mistake and basically exist only for backwards
compatibility with iwd.

So I don't understand why you're advocating for adding new features to
them.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ