[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXAU20NpBGRVOfee@x1>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:50:51 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fixes for gcc 16.0.1
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 03:42:42PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 2:11 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > A bunch of fixes for recent gcc versions,
> >
> > - Arnaldo
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> These look like the least bad resolutions to the new warnings, thanks!
Thanks!
- Arnaldo
> Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists