linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fixes for gcc 16.0.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXK-owoydNf0_AYFhNPnxAgoy5G9smQ6+LtbrUh6W2wDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:42:42 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fixes for gcc 16.0.1

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 2:11 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
>         A bunch of fixes for recent gcc versions,
>
> - Arnaldo

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

These look like the least bad resolutions to the new warnings, thanks!
Ian

> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (4):
>   perf tests sw-clock: Mark the volatile tmp variable as __maybe_unused
>   perf trace: Deal with compiler const checks
>   perf list: Don't write to const memory
>   perf list: Signal changing const memory is ok
>
>  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c     |  2 +-
>  tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c    |  3 ++-
>  tools/perf/util/print-events.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.52.0
>