[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5095fcc5-502f-ec07-8a6f-cb6112ca9bcd@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:51:00 +0800
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@...zbot.org>
CC: <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>,
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix the queue parameter anomaly
issue
On 2026/1/17 1:07, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 15:07:06 +0800
> Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> When the number of QPs initialized by the device, as read via vft, is zero,
>> it indicates either an abnormal device configuration or an abnormal read
>> result.
>> Returning 0 directly in this case would allow the live migration operation
>> to complete successfully, leading to incorrect parameter configuration after
>> migration and preventing the service from recovering normal functionality.
>> Therefore, in such situations, an error should be returned to roll back the
>> live migration operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> index 394f1952a7ed..e0cc20f5f38b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int vf_qm_check_match(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
>> struct hisi_qm *pf_qm = hisi_acc_vdev->pf_qm;
>> struct device *dev = &vf_qm->pdev->dev;
>> u32 que_iso_state;
>> - int ret;
>> + int qp_num, ret;
>>
>> if (migf->total_length < QM_MATCH_SIZE || hisi_acc_vdev->match_done)
>> return 0;
>> @@ -423,18 +423,18 @@ static int vf_qm_check_match(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
>> }
>>
>> /* VF qp num check */
>> - ret = qm_get_vft(vf_qm, &vf_qm->qp_base);
>> - if (ret <= 0) {
>> + qp_num = qm_get_vft(vf_qm, &vf_qm->qp_base);
>> + if (qp_num <= 0) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to get vft qp nums\n");
>> - return ret;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>
> Do you really want to clobber the errno or should this be something
> like:
>
> return qp_num < 0 ? qp_num : -EINVAL;
>
> And if you do that it might make sense to continue to use ret rather
> than add the new variable. Thanks,
>
OK, your proposed fix doesn't require introducing a new variable.
I'll address these issues in the next version.
Thanks.
Longfang.
> Alex
>
>>
>> - if (ret != vf_data->qp_num) {
>> + if (qp_num != vf_data->qp_num) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to match VF qp num\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - vf_qm->qp_num = ret;
>> + vf_qm->qp_num = qp_num;
>>
>> /* VF isolation state check */
>> ret = qm_read_regs(pf_qm, QM_QUE_ISO_CFG_V, &que_iso_state, 1);
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists