linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/26] rv/rvgen: fix typo in generator module docstring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f4c9c640ba1b64c6a6adab779c5fd05a0189972.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 08:51:25 +0100
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, 
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:RUNTIME VERIFICATION
 (RV)"	 <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/26] rv/rvgen: fix typo in generator module docstring

On Mon, 2026-01-19 at 17:45 -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> Fix typo in the module docstring: "Abtract" should be "Abstract".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/generator.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/generator.py
> b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/generator.py
> index fc9be5f6aaa1f..ea1fa0f5d818d 100644
> --- a/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/generator.py
> +++ b/tools/verification/rvgen/rvgen/generator.py
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  #
>  # Copyright (C) 2019-2022 Red Hat, Inc. Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
> <bristot@...nel.org>
>  #
> -# Abtract class for generating kernel runtime verification monitors from
> specification file
> +# Abstract class for generating kernel runtime verification monitors from
> specification file
>  
>  import platform
>  import os

I believe you can fix typos together in the same patch (i.e. merge 10/26 and
11/26).

Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>

to both.

Thanks,
Gabriele