[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXDLtKbJaDHbTaz5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:51:00 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid samples from
FIFO
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 02:47:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:27:57PM +0100, Francesco Lavra wrote:
...
> > st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, u8 tag,
> > u8 *data, s64 ts)
> > {
> > - s16 val = le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)data);
> > struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor;
> > struct iio_dev *iio_dev;
> >
> > /* invalid sample during bootstrap phase */
> > - if (val >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
> > + if ((tag == ST_LSM6DSX_GYRO_TAG || tag == ST_LSM6DSX_ACC_TAG) &&
> > + (s16)le16_to_cpup((__le16 *)data) >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
>
> Since data is u8 *, it might appear on unaligned addresses and the proper
> conversion here is to use get_unaligned_le16() without any of those ugly
> castings.
Okay, (s16) seems needed or another way to allow 0x8000 and higher values.
> > return -EINVAL;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists