[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121024002.GA1845406-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:40:02 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Hervé Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: Add Renesas
RZ/N1D400 to the list
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:39:21AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello Geert,
>
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/cdns,qspi-nor.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/cdns,qspi-nor.yaml
> >> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ properties:
> >> # controllers are meant to be used with flashes of all kinds,
> >> # ie. also NAND flashes, not only NOR flashes.
> >> - const: cdns,qspi-nor
> >> + - items:
> >> + - const: renesas,r9a06g032-qspi
> >> + - const: renesas,rzn1-qspi
> >> + - const: cdns,qspi-nor
> >
> > Doesn't the need for (at least) the CQSPI_NO_INDIRECT_MODE flag mean
> > that this device is not compatible with cdns,qspi-nor, and thus the
> > cdns,qspi-nor fallback must not be used?
>
> I understand the question. It is true that I use driver data to limit
> the number of features the IP can use and this data is associated to the
> Renesas compatible, but I believe all other flavours of this IP would
> also not work without driver data attached to their front
> compatible. None of the SoCs with the Cadence QSPI IP actually would run
> without their own driver data. For me the fallback compatible is
> relevant because it describes the hardware as "this is a derivative of
> the Cadence controller" (and it is clearly the case, and this is also
> mentioned in the reference manual), even though I agree using
> cdns,qspi-nor would definitely not work alone. But again, none of the
> other flavours would anyway.
Fallbacks should be usable on their own. We've generally moved away from
having these generic licensed IP compatibles because they always have
per platform changes.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists