[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXCVSqvkK5PW55t9@zenone.zhora.eu>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:00:14 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: ldewangan@...dia.com, digetx@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, akhilrajeev@...dia.com, smangipudi@...dia.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] i2c: tegra: Introduce tegra_i2c_variant to
identify DVC and VI
Hi Kartik,
...
> @@ -323,12 +334,13 @@ struct tegra_i2c_dev {
> bool atomic_mode;
> bool dma_mode;
> bool msg_read;
> - bool is_dvc;
> - bool is_vi;
> + enum tegra_i2c_variant variant;
why do we need this extra step in this patch and we don't add
"variant" directly in tegra_i2c_dev->hw?
Andi
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists