linux-kernel - Re: REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20260115)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260121090154.Lpaj9hrr@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:01:54 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@...el.com>
Cc: hansg@...nel.org, "Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@...el.com>,
	"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@...el.com>,
	"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	regressions@...mhuis.info
Subject: Re: REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20260115)

On 2026-01-21 13:59:38 [+0530], Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> 
> Looks like it.
>   9:          1          0  IO-APIC   9-fasteoi   acpi, INT0002

Does the following help?

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
index 6f5629dc3f8db..562e880256436 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * FIXME: augment this if we managed to pull handling of shared
 	 * IRQs into gpiolib.
 	 */
-	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq,
-			       IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002", chip);
+	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002",
+			       chip);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Error requesting IRQ %d: %d\n", irq, ret);
 		return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 266f2b39213a0..b2bb878abd113 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline int __must_check
 devm_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
 		 unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
 {
-	return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
+	return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags | IRQF_COND_ONESHOT,
 					 devname, dev_id);
 }
 
My guess would be that the int0002_vgpio.c results in a warning without
requesting the interrupt while the interrupt.h change should fix it and
the warning should be gone.

> ==
> Chaitanya

Sebastian