[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jmdkabxocbq7grui7qvepuymmrygmfps3pcb65wxflnbo75whc@dtvypglu7o4m>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:05:55 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org>
Cc: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: pwm: replace `kernel::c_str!` with C-Strings
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:15:56AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 3:39 AM Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org> wrote:
> > (Side note, b4 told me:
> >
> > ✗ No key: openssh/tamird@...il.com
> >
> > . It's not clear to me how to verify this signature. My experiments
> > include:
> >
> > $ b4 kr --show-keys 20251222-cstr-pwm-v1-1-e8916d976f8d@...il.com
> > ---
> > No keys found in the thread.
> >
> > and looking at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/20251222-cstr-pwm-v1-1-e8916d976f8d@gmail.com/raw
> > where I see
> >
> > X-Developer-Key: i=tamird@...il.com; a=openssh; fpr=SHA256:264rPmnnrb+ERkS7DDS3tuwqcJss/zevJRzoylqMsbc
> >
> > which IIUC isn't enough to verify the next mail signed with the same
> > key. Am I missing something? I very appreciate signing your work, but if
> > there is no way for me (or anyone else) to verify it, there is no gain.)
>
> Yep, you are right to call this out. My usual setup uses SSH keys for
> commit signing, which are not part of the kernel web of trust. I
> promise to start signing kernel work with my GPG key soon :)
While I notice that the trend goes to using ssh-keys, I still prefer
OpenPGP. So +1 on your plan.
> In the meantime if you trust Github you can verify my signature
> against https://github.com/tamird.keys.
OK, for the record:
$ curl --create-dirs -o ~/.local/share/b4/keyring/openssh/gmail.com/tamird/default https://github.com/tamird.keys
makes `b4 am
CAJ-ks9=USrGECVS1qMqs+iCKUqvOdfcjA6phAjaF0wfcTkQt_g@...l.gmail.com`
emit:
✓ Signed: openssh/tamird@...il.com (From: tamird@...nel.org)
This looks a bit strange (because there is gmail and kernel.org), but
better than before.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists