lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121111617.quQxFcZK@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:16:17 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: request_irq() usage in wm8350_register_irq().

Hi,

I've been staring wm8350_register_irq(). It does

| request_threaded_irq(irq + wm8350->irq_base, NULL,
| 		handler, flags, name, data);

and every single user passes 0 as flags. This means it asks for a
threaded IRQ and does not pass IRQF_ONESHOT. 

So either this is not working because it triggers the warnings
	Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT

followed by -EINVAL _or_ every single user of this driver sits in
system where the irqchip is IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE marked.
Which is it?

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ