linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Reorder header includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHc1_P6cPk8T1SXK6jmYPsqzqbwM0h6_9eJ82OiRO-uC1Sn+AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:12:31 +0530
From: Shrikant <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@...il.com, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Reorder header includes

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 2:27 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:54:00 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 02:05:41AM +0530, Shrikant Raskar via B4 Relay wrote:
> >
> > > Reorder header includes to follow kernel include
> > > ordering conventions.
> >
> > FWIW,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
> >
>
> Patches 1 and 2 were already queued up.  I've rebuilt the merge
> in my tree to drop patch 2 without breaking the rest of the history.
>
> Shrikant, it is common for maintainer to pick up the early
> part of a series whilst later parts still need more work.
> If that happens, please rebase on the appropriate tree or
> just drop those patches form your series that have already been
> applied. Otherwise this mess happens where new review comes
> in. Review is always good, but it should be clear if it
> is on applied patches or not!
>
Sorry for creating the confusion, the patches 1 and 2 which were
applied in v4 were dropped from v5 onwards as per your suggestion.
Please see the links of the accepted patches for your reference.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260101-b4-rfd77402_irq-v4-1-42cd54359e9f@gmail.com/
2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260101-b4-rfd77402_irq-v4-2-42cd54359e9f@gmail.com/

As per reviewer comments , I have split the existing patches into
multiple commits like:
1. Added pre-cursor commit for include order
2. Added separate commit for devm mutex initialization
3. Added separate commit for kernel-doc for privata data.

Because of these separated commits, the total number of
patches in series are still 5.

Regards,
Shrikant