[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14a71b33-4c10-41b0-a6cb-585a38e05f56@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:57:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Harshal Dev <harshal.dev@....qualcomm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....qualcomm.com>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@....qualcomm.com>,
Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,ice: Require power-domain
and iface clk
On 23/01/2026 08:11, Harshal Dev wrote:
> Update the inline-crypto engine DT binding to reflect that power-domain and
> clock-names are now mandatory. Also update the maximum number of clocks
> that can be specified to two. These new fields are mandatory because ICE
> needs to vote on the power domain before it attempts to vote on the core
> and iface clocks to avoid clock 'stuck' issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harshal Dev <harshal.dev@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> index c3408dcf5d20..1c2416117d4c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> @@ -28,12 +28,20 @@ properties:
> maxItems: 1
>
> clocks:
> + maxItems: 2
This is ABI break and your commit msg suggests things were not perfect,
but it is not explicit - was this working or not? How is it that ICE was
never tested?
> +
> + clock-names:
> + maxItems: 2
Why "yellowpony" is a correct name? Please look at existing code to see
how this is done.
> +
> + power-domains:
> maxItems: 1
>
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - power-domains
Another ABI break...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists