[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6235f7ee-d0fa-4c46-b98b-54af4d9d5ce8@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 18:04:16 +0000
From: Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pwm-fan for NanoPC-T6
Hello Dragan,
I haven't been able to test patches for a while, but now I have access to
the NanoPC board again, and I've done some tests:
On 10/11/2025 00:23, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Hello Hugh,
>
> Thanks for the v2! Please, see a couple of nitpicks below.
>
> On Sunday, November 09, 2025 20:20 CET, Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com> wrote:
>> FriendlyELEC offers an optional heatsink and fan addon for the NanoPC-T6
>> and T6 LTS, which plugs in to the fan connector on the board driven by
>> pwm1. Add the fan as an active cooling device for the SoC package.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20251026194858.92461-1-sigmaris@gmail.com/
>> * add the fan to the base board dtsi instead of overlay (Heiko)
>> * just use 2 trip points for warm and hot temperatures (Dragan, Alexey)
>>
>> References:
>> FriendlyELEC heatsink with fan addon:
>> https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=305
>> Vendor DT with trip points and PWM duty cycle values:
>> https://github.com/friendlyarm/kernel-rockchip/blob/4944602540b62f5aad139fe602a76cf7c3176128/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopi6-rev01.dts#L75-L90
>
> I think it would be better to move these references to the patch
> description, so they become directly available in the repository.
> It might be the best to use the "... [n]" form for the references,
> which puts them as close to the backed contents as possible.
>
> Oh, and I think that "arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable active cooling
> on NanoPC-T6" as the patch subject would read nicer. :)
>
>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
>> index fafeabe9adf9e..9164a0ee6228e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,vop2.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/usb/pd.h>
>> #include "rk3588.dtsi"
>>
>> @@ -89,6 +90,14 @@ usr_led: led-1 {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + fan: pwm-fan {
>> + compatible = "pwm-fan";
>> + cooling-levels = <0 35 64 100 150 255>;
>> + fan-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000 0>;
>> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> sound {
>> compatible = "simple-audio-card";
>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>> @@ -591,6 +600,36 @@ &i2s6_8ch {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> +&package_thermal {
>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> + trips {
>> + package_warm: package-warm {
>> + temperature = <50000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "active";
>> + };
>> +
>> + package_hot: package-hot {
>> + temperature = <60000>;
>> + hysteresis = <2000>;
>> + type = "active";
>> + };
>> + };
>
> It should be better to use 55 and 65 oC as the trip thresholds,
> because people often report around 50 oC as the observed idle-state
> temperature of their RK3588 SoCs, so increasing the first threshold
Were these people using the heatsink accessory on the NanoPC-T6, or were
they using some other board with worse heat dissipation? I recorded the
package temperature on my NanoPC-T6 with the FriendlyELEC heatsink and fan
and even though it's not idle but actually running Home Assistant,
OpenLDAP, PostgreSQL, Prometheus, Grafana and Nginx, the temperature ranges
between 46 and 48°C, and the fan never even spins up.
Then I ran stress-ng and recorded the temperature under CPU load, with this
version of the patch and another version with 55 & 65°C trip points. [1]
I suspect if people are seeing 50°C at idle, they're either using a less
effective heatsink, or in a very warm ambient temperature. When talking
about the NanoPC-T6 fan specifically, we kinda have to assume the
FriendlyELEC heatsink is used, as there's no mounting for the fan without
the heatsink.
> to 55 oC should be beneficial by preventing the fan from spinning
> when the SoC is actually idle. The second threshold is usually set
> to be 10 oC higher, so it should end up at 65 oC.
I'll send a v3 with 55 and 65°C trip points, but I doubt it makes any
difference to the fan activating while idle; from my testing it seems to
just let the SoC get a bit hotter under heavy load.
[1]: https://gist.github.com/sigmaris/2d5590271cf26da8ec6cfc7ef8e3e8bc
>> + cooling-maps {
>> + map0 {
>> + trip = <&package_warm>;
>> + cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + map1 {
>> + trip = <&package_hot>;
>> + cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> &pcie2x1l0 {
>> reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PB3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc_3v3_pcie20>;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists