lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe32b221-5bc3-0505-49d1-5bc374cf2267@manjaro.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 19:37:27 +0100
From: "Dragan Simic" <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: "Hugh Cole-Baker" <sigmaris@...il.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@...ech.de>, "Alexey Charkov" <alchark@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add pwm-fan for NanoPC-T6

Hello Hugh,

On Sunday, January 25, 2026 19:04 CET, Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2025 00:23, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 09, 2025 20:20 CET, Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com> wrote:
> >> FriendlyELEC offers an optional heatsink and fan addon for the NanoPC-T6
> >> and T6 LTS, which plugs in to the fan connector on the board driven by
> >> pwm1. Add the fan as an active cooling device for the SoC package.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hugh Cole-Baker <sigmaris@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes from v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20251026194858.92461-1-sigmaris@gmail.com/
> >> * add the fan to the base board dtsi instead of overlay (Heiko)
> >> * just use 2 trip points for warm and hot temperatures (Dragan, Alexey)
> >>
> >> References:
> >> FriendlyELEC heatsink with fan addon:
> >> https://www.friendlyelec.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=305
> >> Vendor DT with trip points and PWM duty cycle values:
> >> https://github.com/friendlyarm/kernel-rockchip/blob/4944602540b62f5aad139fe602a76cf7c3176128/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopi6-rev01.dts#L75-L90
> > 
> > I think it would be better to move these references to the patch
> > description, so they become directly available in the repository.
> > It might be the best to use the "... [n]" form for the references,
> > which puts them as close to the backed contents as possible.
> > 
> > Oh, and I think that "arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable active cooling
> > on NanoPC-T6" as the patch subject would read nicer. :)
> > 
> >>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
> >> index fafeabe9adf9e..9164a0ee6228e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-nanopc-t6.dtsi
> >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,vop2.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/usb/pd.h>
> >>  #include "rk3588.dtsi"
> >>  
> >> @@ -89,6 +90,14 @@ usr_led: led-1 {
> >>  		};
> >>  	};
> >>  
> >> +	fan: pwm-fan {
> >> +		compatible = "pwm-fan";
> >> +		cooling-levels = <0 35 64 100 150 255>;
> >> +		fan-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> >> +		pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000 0>;
> >> +		#cooling-cells = <2>;
> >> +	};
> >> +
> >>  	sound {
> >>  		compatible = "simple-audio-card";
> >>  		pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> @@ -591,6 +600,36 @@ &i2s6_8ch {
> >>  	status = "okay";
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +&package_thermal {
> >> +	polling-delay = <1000>;
> >> +
> >> +	trips {
> >> +		package_warm: package-warm {
> >> +			temperature = <50000>;
> >> +			hysteresis = <2000>;
> >> +			type = "active";
> >> +		};
> >> +
> >> +		package_hot: package-hot {
> >> +			temperature = <60000>;
> >> +			hysteresis = <2000>;
> >> +			type = "active";
> >> +		};
> >> +	};
> > 
> > It should be better to use 55 and 65 oC as the trip thresholds,
> > because people often report around 50 oC as the observed idle-state
> > temperature of their RK3588 SoCs, so increasing the first threshold
> 
> Were these people using the heatsink accessory on the NanoPC-T6, or were
> they using some other board with worse heat dissipation? I recorded the
> package temperature on my NanoPC-T6 with the FriendlyELEC heatsink and fan
> and even though it's not idle but actually running Home Assistant,
> OpenLDAP, PostgreSQL, Prometheus, Grafana and Nginx, the temperature ranges
> between 46 and 48°C, and the fan never even spins up.
> 
> Then I ran stress-ng and recorded the temperature under CPU load, with this
> version of the patch and another version with 55 & 65°C trip points. [1]
> 
> I suspect if people are seeing 50°C at idle, they're either using a less
> effective heatsink, or in a very warm ambient temperature. When talking
> about the NanoPC-T6 fan specifically, we kinda have to assume the
> FriendlyELEC heatsink is used, as there's no mounting for the fan without
> the heatsink.

Those are all valid points, the overall thermal performance depends
on the room temperature and the actually used cooling solution, while
the latter depends on the specific board.

You're right that, based on thermals you observed, raising the trip
points to 55 and 65 oC may not always lead to the expected improvements,
but let's keep in mind that it actually may keep the fan spinning less
in some environments, which is good for both the end-user perception
and for the fan's longevity.

> > to 55 oC should be beneficial by preventing the fan from spinning
> > when the SoC is actually idle.  The second threshold is usually set
> > to be 10 oC higher, so it should end up at 65 oC.
> 
> I'll send a v3 with 55 and 65°C trip points, but I doubt it makes any
> difference to the fan activating while idle; from my testing it seems to
> just let the SoC get a bit hotter under heavy load.
> 
> [1]: https://gist.github.com/sigmaris/2d5590271cf26da8ec6cfc7ef8e3e8bc

Having the SoC running about 5 oC hotter under load is still fine while
it possibly makes the fan spin a bit less, so it may all together be
a reasonable compromise.

> >> +	cooling-maps {
> >> +		map0 {
> >> +			trip = <&package_warm>;
> >> +			cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
> >> +		};
> >> +
> >> +		map1 {
> >> +			trip = <&package_hot>;
> >> +			cooling-device = <&fan 2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> >> +		};
> >> +	};
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  &pcie2x1l0 {
> >>  	reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PB3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >>  	vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc_3v3_pcie20>;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ