[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260126121803.4a90c959@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:18:03 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo
Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/5] perf: Use current->flags &
PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:05:53 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org> wrote:
> I guess we need to also test for !current->mm because the flags set for an
> exiting task is done when we can still do callchains. Thus, the only way to
> know if it is safe to do a callchain when a task is exiting is via task->mm
> and not task->flags :-/
Can you test this patch?
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 1f6589578703..c82d61d73bd8 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -246,7 +246,14 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
if (user && !crosstask) {
if (!user_mode(regs)) {
- if (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER))
+ /*
+ * Testing current->mm is not enough as some kernel threads
+ * may have one set. But testing the flags is not enough
+ * either as this can be called after a user task
+ * frees its mm just before it exits.
+ */
+ if (!current->mm ||
+ (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER)))
goto exit_put;
regs = task_pt_regs(current);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists