linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] mm/vma: update vma_assert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72870813-1355-431a-91aa-9b9335e136a5@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:16:37 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] mm/vma: update vma_assert_locked() to use
 lockdep

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 04:44:07PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 02:42:00PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 1/23/26 21:12, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > We can use lockdep to avoid unnecessary work here, otherwise update the
> > > code to logically evaluate all pertinent cases and share code with
> > > vma_assert_write_locked().
> > >
> > > Make it clear here that we treat the VMA being detached at this point as a
> > > bug, this was only implicit before.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Nit:
> >
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
> > > index 23bde4bd5a85..4a0aafc66c5d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mmap_lock.h
> > > @@ -322,19 +322,56 @@ int vma_start_write_killable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > >  	return __vma_start_write(vma, __vma_raw_mm_seqnum(vma), TASK_KILLABLE);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * vma_assert_write_locked() - assert that @vma holds a VMA write lock.
> > > + * @vma: The VMA to assert.
> > > + */
> > >  static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > >  {
> > >  	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_VMA(!__is_vma_write_locked(vma), vma);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * vma_assert_locked() - assert that @vma holds either a VMA read or a VMA write
> > > + * lock and is not detached.
> > > + * @vma: The VMA to assert.
> > > + */
> > >  static inline void vma_assert_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > >  {
> > > +	unsigned int refcnt;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * If read-locked or currently excluding readers, then the VMA is
> > > +	 * locked.
> > > +	 */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> > > +	if (lock_is_held(&vma->vmlock_dep_map))
> > > +		return;
> >
> > Wouldn't this work a tiny bit better?
> >
> > 	if (!lock_is_held(&vma->vmlock_dep_map))
> > 		vma_assert_write_locked(vma);
> > 	return;
>
> Hm yeah could do, I guess we don't need to mix the 'uncertain' stuff below with
> the lockdep-certainty, at this point we _know_ there is no read lock/readers
> being excluded exclusive lock so it can only be a write lock.
>
> Will test locally to make sure sane then send a fix-patch. :)

Actually I think I can get rid of this #ifdef here, will fold it into patch...