[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXc3lPNFF18ygeow@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 11:44:52 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Shrikant <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Use kernel helper for
result polling
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 10:26:04PM +0530, Shrikant wrote:
...
> > > + 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > > + 10 * 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> >
> > This makes sleeps shorter by 2. Why?
> I have considered the timeout values from the RFD77402 datasheet.
> The timeout values mentioned in section 3.1.1 Single Measure are as below:
> 1. Every Status Check = 10ms
> 2. Whole Flow = 100 ms
So, you should do this in a separate change explaining this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists