linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Use kernel helper for result polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHc1_P5hY6-z5s0J4SW_2GMER+NP4NsqoVVVaYFUg_gRi=31JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 22:26:04 +0530
From: Shrikant <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, david.hunter.linux@...il.com, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iio: proximity: rfd77402: Use kernel helper for
 result polling

>
> > +                              10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
> > +                              10 * 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
>
> This makes sleeps shorter by 2. Why?
I have considered the timeout values from the RFD77402 datasheet.
The timeout values mentioned in section 3.1.1 Single Measure are as below:
1. Every Status Check = 10ms
2. Whole Flow = 100 ms

Regards,
Shrikant