[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d98306c-0e13-4bd9-9cfd-0a2ddcadef3e@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:16:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,mqs: make gpr optional for
SM-based SoCs
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:18:42AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 07:03:28AM -0800, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> > From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
> >
> > For SM-based SoCs (i.e. MX95, MX943), GPR configuration is performed by
> > the SM coprocessor. Thus, the programming model needs no handle to the
> > GPR node. Make it optional.
>
> "programming model" look like software configuration.
>
> Thus, GPR is transparent to software and does not need to be described in the
> device tree. Make it optional.
I was expecting a new version of this with Frank's comments rolled in.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists