[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkznMVh240wMUZGayJHRzsUV-NNTiU+ezpLt3rjcwSn5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 08:47:17 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Not report loaded resource
table when none
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 23:51, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> priv->rsc_table is not NULL if the DT has a "rsc-table" entry, indicating
> that _if_ there is a resource table in memory, that's where it should be.
> Function imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table() is buggy so the narrative
> about a previously running FW with a valid resource table can be dropped.
>
(sigh)
You apparently did not understand my last comment.
> In this case rproc->table_ptr is NULL because the current firmware does
> not contain a resource table, but the remoteproc core still interprets the
> non-NULL return value as a loaded resource table and attempts to memcpy()
> from rproc->cached_table, leading to a NULL pointer dereference and kernel
> panic.
>
> Fix this by returning NULL from imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table() when
> there is no cached resource table for the current firmware. This ensures
> that a loaded resource table is only reported when a valid table_ptr
> exists, which matches the remoteproc core expectations.
>
> This issue can be reproduced by:
> 1) start a firmware with a resource table
> 2) stop the remote processor
> 3) start a firmware without a resource table
>
Another sign you did not understand my last comment.
I had hopes of merging this patch but the changelog is too garbled to
be salvageable. I suggest you ask Daniel or Iuliana for help.
> With this change, starting a firmware without a resource table no longer
> causes kernel dump.
>
> Fixes: e954a1bd1610 ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: Use imx specific hook for find_loaded_rsc_table")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Per Mathieu, Check rproc->table_ptr, update commit log
> - Include R-b from Frank
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260122-imx-rproc-fix-v1-1-36cc64369a40@nxp.com
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 375de79168a1c8d11b87ac1bd63774a3feac106d..f5f916d6790519360f446f063e09d018c5654953 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -729,6 +729,10 @@ imx_rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *
> {
> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>
> + /* No resource table in the firmware */
> + if (!rproc->table_ptr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (priv->rsc_table)
> return (struct resource_table *)priv->rsc_table;
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: e3b32dcb9f23e3c3927ef3eec6a5842a988fb574
> change-id: 20260122-imx-rproc-fix-e206f8e6e477
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists