[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76bf33a0-968d-4b99-a157-3eef076af69d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:41:05 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/30] arm64/fpsimd: Check enable bit for FA64 when
saving EFI state
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 04:39:33PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes:
> > Currently when deciding if we need to save FFR when in streaming mode prior
> > to EFI calls we check if FA64 is supported by the system. Since KVM guest
> > support will mean that FA64 might be enabled and disabled at runtime switch
> > to checking if traps for FA64 are enabled in SMCR_EL1 instead.
> This is conflicting with the now merged 63de2b3859ba1 (arm64/efi: Remove
> unneeded SVE/SME fallback preserve/store handling) so I think this patch
> can now be dropped?
Yes, this should go away in the next rebase.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists