linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Flush exception handling work when RPM level is zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <076fe171-6fd3-4dbc-9876-242905379594@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:23:38 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Thomas Yen <thomasyen@...gle.com>
Cc: Stable Tree <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
 "open list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER"
 <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Flush exception handling work
 when RPM level is zero

On 1/29/26 9:19 AM, Thomas Yen wrote:
> I had just sent v4 (to add the missing Fixes tag) before seeing this
> message. Since the code logic in v4 is identical to v3, I hope that is
> acceptable.
It seems like our emails crossed each other. This is something that can
happen.

When reposting a patch, Reviewed-by tags should be included. I don't see
any Reviewed-by tags in v4 of this patch although Peter Wang had posted
a Reviewed-by?

Thanks,

Bart.