linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Flush exception handling work when RPM level is zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALw5pqH8LDxxHcpS=KGnLtdA0GG7sdd1y3Zz9hQLfcChgyH+GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:39:50 +0800
From: Thomas Yen <thomasyen@...gle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Stable Tree <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, 
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, 
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, 
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, 
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>, 
	"open list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Flush exception handling work
 when RPM level is zero

Hi Bart,

My apologies. I missed that Peter had already replied with his
Reviewed-by tag on this v3 thread before I sent v4.

Since v4 is currently bare of tags but the code is identical, would
you prefer I send a v5 to consolidate all the tags and fix the Cc-tag
ordering? Or should I wait for you and Peter to reply to the v4
thread?

Thanks,
Thomas

On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 1:23 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/26 9:19 AM, Thomas Yen wrote:
> > I had just sent v4 (to add the missing Fixes tag) before seeing this
> > message. Since the code logic in v4 is identical to v3, I hope that is
> > acceptable.
> It seems like our emails crossed each other. This is something that can
> happen.
>
> When reposting a patch, Reviewed-by tags should be included. I don't see
> any Reviewed-by tags in v4 of this patch although Peter Wang had posted
> a Reviewed-by?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.