[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48f1c033-4a0a-4b17-aae0-9c712748b2ed@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:01:15 -0800
From: Bo Gan <ganboing@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
李志 <lizhi2@...incomputing.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com, weishangjuan@...incomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock sampling
control
On 1/28/26 02:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/01/2026 11:47, Bo Gan wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 1/23/26 02:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/01/2026 08:39, Bo Gan wrote:
>>>>> I assume the address of the interface is fixed. So you can just key
>>>>> off that to distinguish the two instances.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this is an internal property, not a board property, it is not
>>>>> clear it actually belongs on DT.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> IMO, they should be in DT to provide maximum flexibility. The SoC .dtsi
>>>
>>> This is not the purpose of DT. Please rather use arguments in terms of
>>> DT rules (see docs, presentations).
>>>
>> Any examples? links? Thank you for your patience.
>
> Really, doing simple search for it is your homework, not our task. You
> need to try harder if you want to prove that you are not wasting our time.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings
>
> Or any elinux resources or any recent talks of mine.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
You brought up the "use arguments in terms of DT rules" approach. and all I
ask is just some pointers to make sure I'm not misinterpreting. No offense,
but The way you slamming people w/ "not doing their homework" is truly not
constructive.
Bo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists